Input keywords, title, abstract, author, affiliation etc..
Journal Article An open access journal
Open Access Journal Article

Value-Driven CSR in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: The Guiding Role of Party-Building Values

by Xiaoqi Shen 1,*  and  Jian Wang 1
1
College of Foreign Languages, Qingdao Agricultural University, No. 700 Changcheng Road,Chengyang District, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, 266109,China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published Online: 22 August 2025

Abstract

This study examines the role of Communist Party of China (CPC) core values in guiding corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Drawing on textual analysis of annual reports and CSR reports from a sample of SOEs across multiple industries, the research investigates which core party-building values are emphasized, the alignment between these values and CSR activities, and the differences across industries. Results show that “integrity” and “responsibility” are most prominent in the financial sector, while “innovation” is highlighted in the manufacturing sector. CSR practices demonstrate a high degree of alignment with party values, particularly in ethical and philanthropic dimensions, reflecting the influence of party-led governance. Industry comparisons reveal that financial firms exhibit the highest values–CSR alignment, whereas manufacturing firms show relatively lower alignment. The study contributes to understanding the localization of CSR in China and provides practical implications for integrating party values into corporate responsibility strategies.


Copyright: © 2025 by Shen and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Shen, X.; Wang, J. Value-Driven CSR in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: The Guiding Role of Party-Building Values. Scientific Innovation in Asia, 2025, 3, 74. doi:10.12410/sia0303021
AMA Style
Shen X., Wang J.. Value-Driven CSR in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: The Guiding Role of Party-Building Values. Scientific Innovation in Asia; 2025, 3(3):74. doi:10.12410/sia0303021
Chicago/Turabian Style
Shen, Xiaoqi; Wang, Jian 2025. "Value-Driven CSR in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: The Guiding Role of Party-Building Values" Scientific Innovation in Asia 3, no.3:74. doi:10.12410/sia0303021

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
  2. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
  3. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research, and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
  4. Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. (2024). Decision on Further Deepening Reform to Promote Chinese-Style Modernization. Xinhua News Agency. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202407/content_6963770.htm
  5. Ervits, I. (2023). CSR reporting in China’s private and state-owned enterprises: A mixed methods comparative analysis. Asian Business & Management, 22, 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-021-00147-1
  6. He, X., Si, Z., & Yu, X. (2025). The Influential Factors of CSR Reporting in China: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Accounting Finance & Governance Review, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.52399/001c.134077
  7. Hishan, S. S., Ramakrishnan, S., & Abu Mansor, N. N. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review. Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Journal, 1(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.54480/slrm.v1i1.1
  8. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838-849. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227
  9. Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0560-8
  10. Jamali, D., & Neville, B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 599–621.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0
  11. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
  12. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
  13. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
  14. National Development and Reform Commission. (2021). Report on the Implementation of the 2024 National Economic and Social Development Plan and the Draft 2025 Plan. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202503/content_7013429.htm
  15. Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878
  16. Parsa, S., Kouhy, R. (2008). Social Reporting by Companies Listed on the Alternative Investment Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9402-8
  17. State Council. (2021). 14th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development and the 2035 Long-Term Goals Outline. Xinhua News Agency. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm
  18. Wang, S., & Liang, Y. (2025). Embedding Party Organization Governance in Energy Management: Effects on Corporate Carbon Emissions in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. Energies, 18(9), 2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092320
  19. Wang, J. (2022). CSR as CPR: The Political Logic of Corporate Social Responsibility in China. USALI East-West Studies, 2(5). https://usali.org/asia-pacific-symposium-essays/csr-as-cpr-the-political-logic-of-corporate-social-responsibility-in-china?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  20. Yao, Z., Zhang, Z., and Ma, J. (2023). Party branches, policy perception and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:1048060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1048060
  21. Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1243-4
  22. Zeng, Jie. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Tool of Policy Implementation. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0085
  23. Zhang, H., Li, L., Fan, C., Hang, Z., & Khan, H. u. R. (2021). How Does Corporate Party Committee Governance Affect Charitable Donations? Evidence from Heavy-Pollution Industries in China. Sustainability, 13(21), 12242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112242
  24. Zhong, M., Zhao, W., & Shahab, Y. (2022). The philanthropic response of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility strategies to COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2204